Canola response to plant density at Salmon Gums 2013 trial report

Page last updated: Friday, 1 November 2019 - 4:25pm

Please note: This content may be out of date and is currently under review.

This trial looked at plant density in low rainfall canola. The trial took place at Salmon Gums (Tim Osborne's property) and was conducted by the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) in 2013. These trials fall under the 'Tactical Break Crop Agronomy project' (DAW00227), funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC).

Summary

  • Grain yields of most canola varieties at Salmon Gums started to plateau at ~20 plants per square metre (plants/m2).
  • Taking into account the costs of increasing plant density we calculated the economic optimum for higher cost seed types such as Roundup Ready (RR) and hybrid Triazine Tolerant (TT) to be 25 plants/m2 or less.
  • Hyola 404RR had the flattest response indicating its yields were less affected by lower plant densities.

Background

Canola is now being grown in low rainfall areas. Primarily growers choose open-pollinated TT varieties. However breeding companies are favouring the development of hybrids in order to pay for breeding services. Hybrids provide growers with more vigorous seedlings, comparatively better plant establishment and generally higher yields. However growers have to purchase new seed of hybrid varieties every year in order to get these potential yield benefits. Seed for hybrid canola is 25 times more expensive than the seed of open-pollinated canola. Inevitably if growers decide to use hybrids they may wish to minimise seed costs by sowing at low densities.

Aim

To investigate the plant density response to yield and oil content of TT and RR hybrid canola in comparison with open-pollinated canola.

Trial details

Property Tim, Dave and Fiona Osborne’s, Eldred Road Salmon Gums
Agzone 5 Growing season rainfall (GSR) = 206mm, GSR + stored water (estimate) = 277mm
Soil type sandy loam (0.8% organic carbon)
Paddock rotation 2012 - heat, 2011 - barley, 2010 - canola
Sowing date 17 April 2013
Fertiliser 99kg/ha of Allstar at seeding (13.1%N, 14.8%P, 15%S, 0.1% Cu, 0.2% Zn, 7ppm Mo, 0.02% Mn), 120kg/ha of muriate of potash and 400kg/ha of gypsum (17% Ca, 14% S) topdressed over whole site four weeks after seeding, 145L/ha of UAN (32%N) in June
Treatments 36: 2 HT - Herbicide tolerant canola (TT and RR).
Four cultivars.
TT– OP = CB Telfer TT and Hybrid = Hyola 450TT.
RR - OP = GT Viper, Hybrid = Hyola 404 RR.
Eight densities of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 60 or 80 plants/m2
Replicates 3

Assumptions used in gross margins

  • Oil bonus +/- 1.5% per unit of oil (%) either side of 42%, with no oil ceiling
  • Additional costs such as seeding, harvest, insecticides assumed to be $100/ha
  • Nitrogen costs $1/kg, application costs $8/ha
  • RR costs – seed $31/kg, herbicides $28/ha, grain worth $482/t (CBH Pool Esperance 5 November 2013)
  • TT costs – seed $2/kg, herbicides $47/ha, grain worth $502/t (CBH Pool Esperance 5 November 2013)

Results

Grain yields of most canola varieties at Salmon Gums started to plateau at ~ 20 plants/m2 (Figure 1). Taking into account the costs of increasing plant density we calculated the economic optimum for higher cost seed types such as RR and hybrid TT to be 25 plants/m2 or less. Hyola 404RR had the flattest response indicating its yields were less affected by lower plant densities.

CB Telfer was the lowest yielding variety at Salmon Gums in 2013, which may be attributed to its earlier maturity not making use of late spring rains to the same degree as other varieties. In spite of a long slow increase in yield with increasing plant density, the low cost of seed for CB Telfer ensured a slighter higher economic density of 31 plants/m2.

Hyola 450TT was the highest yielding variety at Salmon Gums and produced the highest gross margins of $473/ha. Gross margins of all other varieties were in the range of $343-$379/ha (averaged over densities).

Graph showing the different plant density and grain yield of CB Telfer.
Figure 1 Relationship between plant density (observed, plants/m²) and the grain yield of CB Telfer at Osbornes, Salmon Gums in 2013.
Graph showing the different plant density among Hyola 450TT
Figure 2 Relationship between plant density (observed, plants/m²) and the grain yield of Hyola 450TT at Osbornes, Salmon Gums in 2013.
Graph showing the different plant density and grain yield among the GT Viper variety.
Figure 3 Relationship between plant density (observed, plants/m²) and the grain yield of GT Viper at Osbornes, Salmon Gums in 2013.
Graph showing the different plant density and grain yield in the Hyola 404RR variety.
Figure 4 Relationship between plant density (observed, plants/m²) and grain yield of Hyola404RR at Osbornes, Salmon Gums in 2013.
Graph showing the relationship between plant density and the gross margin of four different canola varieties.
Relationship between plant density (observed, plants/m²) and the gross margin of TT OP (CB Telfer, TT hybrid (Hyola 450TT), RR OP (GT Viper) and RR hybrid (Hyola 404RR) at Osborne’s, Salmon Gums in 2013 (13ED09).
Table 1 Summary of economic optimum density (plants/m2) of canola from 11 experiments conducted throughout WA in 2013
Location CB Telfer or ATR Stingray Hyola 450TT GT Viper Hyola 404RR Comments
Cunderdin 25 22 28 17 No comments
Eradu 34 33 24 16 No comments
Grass Patch* 53 71 53 41 Low density treatments targeted by birds
Holt Rock 39 20 30 38 No comments
Katanning 39 24 39 21 TT blocks weedier - more ryegrass in low density
Merredin 22 20 17 18 TT blocks weedier - more ryegrass in low density
Miling 36 27 20 12 Low establishment, low density = more ryegrass
Mullewa 19 12 10 14 Extended dry period and aphids
Pingrup 29 23 19 18 No comments
Salmon Gums 31 25 22 18 Late emerging barley grass understory in RR blocks
Wongan Hills 40 35 34 21 TT blocks weedier, more ryegrass in low density

Conclusion

The economic optimum plant density of canola appears to be different for each type of canola and in some instances may need to be altered for rainfall zones. Open-pollinated TT canola which dominates the WA industry had higher optimum densities primarily because of the low cost of increasing density.

Optimum target densities and suggested seeding rates based on 2013 experiments are:

  • OP TT - 31 plants/m2 which equates to a seeding rate of 2.1kg/ha for ATR Stingray and 2.4kg/ha for CB Telfer - but there is no economic reason not to go higher with grower retained seed.
  • Hybrid TT - 23 plants/m2 (seed rate of ~ 1.4kg/ha). Using such a low seed rate may be risk so it may pay to increase seed rate if conditions are questionable or machine is not calibrated for low seeding rates.
  • OP RR – 24 plants/m2 (seed rate of 2.2kg/ha).
  • Hybrid RR - 20 plants/m2 equivalent to a seed rate of ~ 2.1kg/ha. Adjust seed rate for variety/seed lot seed size differences.

Note that all optimum densities calculated here assume a given field establishment of 50% for OP’s and 65% for hybrids and 90% germination test. As observed field establishment rates can vary due to soil moisture, temperature and seeding errors. Similarly seed size may vary from those used in our trials. Grower retained seed of TT OPs in dry areas is often smaller than purchased seed and it is our experience that hybrid seed size varies markedly from year to year. Therefore seed rates should be adjusted to suit individual circumstances. Variations in grain prices, seed size, germination and field establishment may also affect our optimum density calculations, particularly if the calculated optima are not on the plateau of the response curve. In most instances for OP TTs and RR hybrids the calculated optima are on the plateau of the response curve and variations in assumptions and changing crop density will affect gross margins slightly. However for TT hybrids and RR OPs the crop gross margins may be more sensitive to variations in density.

Acknowledgements

This trial (13ED09) is one of a series conducted throughout WA as part of the GRDC/DPIRD co-funded project 'Tactical Break Crop Agronomy in Western Australia'. Thanks to the Osborne family for hosting the trial and to the Esperance Research Support Unit for trial management. Pam Burgess (DPIRD Esperance) provided technical assistance to ensure all treatments and measurements occurred in a timely and accurate fashion.