Sheep reproduction and reducing methane emissions

Page last updated: Tuesday, 19 March 2024 - 12:16pm

Please note: This content may be out of date and is currently under review.

Running a flock of sheep and raising lambs has both direct (enteric fermentation) and indirect (lime, fertiliser, fuel, production of feed) greenhouse gas emissions.

The emissions intensity of the sheep industry is measured by the greenhouse gas emissions produced per unit of product. For sheep this is kilograms of liveweight (kgLW) sold. It is expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents per kilogram (CO2e/kgLW).

Ewes are usually mated for the first time at 18–20 months of age: mating ewes at 8–10 months of age could enable farmers to reduce the numbers of adult ewes, and therefore reduce whole-farm methane emissions.

Katanning Research Station Case study

Katanning Research Station runs a commercial self-replacing Merino sheep flock of around 1000 breeding ewes. The top 90% of ewe lambs are retained to top up research flocks or remain in the commercial flock, and all wether lambs are sold.

This flock has been used to model different weaning and turn-off rates, and the effects these changes can make on total greenhouse gas emissions and emissions intensity. In 2022, the commercial flock had a weaning rate of 113%, and an average turn-off weight of 44kg at 215 days old. The growth rate from weaning was 160g/hd/day. The total emissions for this flock was estimated to be 522 tonnes of CO2e with an emissions intensity of 23kg CO2e/kgLW.

Efficiency scenarios

Strategy 1. More efficient lamb production.

For every 10% increase in weaning rates, there is an almost equivalent percentage reduction in the amount of carbon emissions for each lamb weaned/sold, that is, a reduction of ~7-9% in emissions intensity (Figure 1). The scenario did add 1% to the sheep enterprise's total emissions per 10% improvement above the 100% weaning rate.

Strategy 1 - More efficient lamb production
Figure 1. The change in total emissions and emission intensity for different weaning rates.

Strategy 2. Run fewer ewes whilst maintaining productivity.

To reduce total carbon emissions the number of ewes need to be reduced. Using KRS as an example, if weaning rates were increased from 110% to 120%, (ie. an additional 100 lambs from 1000 ewes joined), the number of ewes could be reduced to 917 to maintain the 1100 total lambs weaned.

This reduces the total carbon emissions by 9%, or 37 tonnes of CO2e, which is equivalent to 1 person flying from Perth to London 7 times.

This is in addition to the gains made in carbon intensity from improving weaning rate, giving a total emissions reduction of ~8% (taking into account the increased total emissions from producing more lambs.)

Strategy 3: Grow lambs quicker and sell them younger.

Total emissions increase by 0.7% with increased turn-off age of all liveweights due to the extra 15 days on the farm. Similarly, emissions intensity also increases with increased turn-off age, however, the increase in emissions intensity of larger lambs is reduced. Ie. 50kg lambs have a much lower emissions intensity than the 40kg lambs.  This is achieved by improving efficiency and growing them quicker. By turning-off lambs 5kg heavier at the same age, emissions intensity can be reduced by 8%.

Figure 2a. The impact on total emissions of growing lambs out faster and selling earlier
Figure 2a. The impact on total emissions of growing lambs out faster and selling earlier
Figure 2b.  The impact on emissions intensity of growing lambs out faster and selling earlier
Figure 2b. The impact on emissions intensity of growing lambs out faster and selling earlier

Co-benefits to reducing greenhouse gas emissions

  • Reducing reproductive wastage – more lambs to sell.
  • Higher genetic turnover and improved genetic selection.
  • More effective use of supplementary feeds and pasture allocation.
  • Access to premium markets through low emission produce. 

Ways to improve efficiency

  • Nutrition – Ewe nutrition during joining, lambing and lactation improves  lambing rates and lamb survival as well as increasing liveweight and lowering turn off times of lambs.
  • Lamb survival rates – good nutrition, time of lambing, improved pasture, and providing shelter for twin-bearing ewes is key to increased productivity.
  • Genetics – Using the Australian Sheep Breeding Value definitions ASBVs when selecting rams for reproductive and sustainability traits (feed efficiency and methane production/yield when available).
  • Good animal welfare – Healthy animals produce more. Improving welfare (use of pain relief at marking, right vaccinations at right time  will improve the quality and profitability of livestock).
  • Pregnancy scanning – removes unproductive ewes that emit methane for no productivity gain.

Risks of reducing methane emissions through managing sheep reproduction

  • Selecting animals purely on their methane emissions can lead to selecting sheep that have reduced feed intake and therefore reduced production.
  • Just lowering emissions intensity of your enterprise may not lead to reduced total emissions, which is important if your goal is to achieve carbon neutrality at the farm business level.
  • More intensive management may lead to greater indirect emissions from inputs such as fuel and fertiliser use.

Contact information

Kate McCormack