Barley yield and biomass production when pasture cropped over subtropical perennial grasses 2013 trial report

Page last updated: Friday, 4 May 2018 - 9:09am

Biomass production was greater and distribution of green feed over time wider for the pasture-crop compared to crop only or permanent pasture systems.

All pasture-crop treatments yielded over 2t/ha of grain in 2013, however pasture crops generally incurred a yield penalty relative to crop only controls.

Pasture crops can improve the perennial base by delivering additional fertiliser with the crop and enforcing a rest from grazing during the winter growing season.

In 2013, the flow on benefit of extra nitrogen in the preceding pasture-crop was greater perennial growth over the subsequent summer.

Background and aim

From 2009-2013, personnel with the Future Farm Industries Cooperative Research Centre Ltd’s EverCrop project evaluated the viability of pasture cropping over different subtropical species at a focus site south-west of Moora.

The trial was based on a barley-lupin rotation with crops sown into annual and perennial pastures.

Results were very promising for both barley (2009, 2011) and lupin (2010, 2012) crops with little or no yield penalty (0-15%) in pasture crops when fertilised in line with district practice (Ward et al. 2012).

The perennial grasses at the focus site were originally sown in 2008; they established well, but over time the density of Rhodes grass has declined.

For instance, in 2012, Rhodes grass (unlike Gatton panic grass) did not recover well from the grass selective herbicide (Verdict®) sprayed on the lupin crop.

This report compares the grain yield results for the 2013 barley crop sown alone or into Gatton panic grass and Rhodes grass plots.

It also highlights biomass production over time for Gatton panic grass-based systems as a pasture crop could be used to supplement available feed of subtropical perennial grass pastures, especially in winter when they become dormant.

Trial details

Table 1 Trial details
Property Yanda (Chris Vanzetti’s) 20km south-west of Moora
Soil type Deep pale sand: surface pH(CaCl2), 5.3 and OC, 1.1% (0-10cm)
Crop/variety Buloke
Paddock rotation 2009 - barley, 2010 - lupin, 2011 - barley, 2012 - lupin, 2013 - barley
Treatments

Crop only with 50kg N/ha

Crop only with 80kg N/ha

Gatton panic only, 36cm row spacing

Gatton panic, 36cm row spacing, pasture cropped with 50kg N/ha

Gatton panic, 36cm row spacing, pasture cropped with 80kg N/ha

Gatton panic only, 72cm row spacing

Gatton panic, 72cm row spacing, pasture cropped with 50kg N/ha

Gatton panic, 72cm row spacing, pasture cropped with 80kg N/ha

Rhodes grass only, (originally 36cm row spacing)

Rhodes grass, pasture cropped with 50kg N/ha

Rhodes grass, pasture cropped with 80kg N/ha

Replicates Three
Sowing date 23 May 2013
Seeding rate 80kg/ha
Management inputs

Fertiliser

23 May 2013 - seeding: 80kg/ha Agstar Extra

17 June 2013: 50kg/ha sulphate of ammonia, 50kg/ha muriate of potash, 30kg/ha urea

14 July 2013: 100kg/ha urea on high N plots, 30kg/ha urea on low N plots

 

Chemical

Pre-seeding: 1.0L/ha Glyphosate 450

23 May 2013 - seeding: 1.0L/ha SpraySeed®, 3.0L/ha Treflan™

Post-seeding: 0.8 L/ha Barracuda®, 1.0L/ha Decision®

Results

Biomass of Gatton panic grass and barley

Figure 1 shows standing green biomass of over time for Gatton panic grass and barley grown as pasture only, crop only or a combined (pasture-crop) system.

The perennial grass was mown twice in summer (30 January and 21 April 2013) to simulate grazing.

Perennial pasture growth is dependent on seasonal conditions, especially temperature and rainfall in spring and summer.

Between November 2012 and January 2013, 130mm of rain fell resulting in useful growth of the perennial grasses over summer (Figure 1).

Gatton panic grass produced between 860-1400kg/ha of feed in January.

But available green feed declined under dryer conditions and then with the onset of cooler temperatures in winter (June to July).

Barley sown alone produced 5.4t/ha of biomass but 26% less (4.3t/ha) when sown over subtropical grasses.

This difference was less (15%) when an extra 70kg/ha of urea was applied to the crop only and pasture-crop plots (7.5 vs 6.5t/ha biomass respectively).

An area chart showing the combined biomass of barley pasture cropped into Gatton panic from October 2012 to October 2013 and compared to barley and panic grown separately. Y axis shows plant biomass in tonnes per hectare, X axis shows the date.

Figure 1 Standing green biomass over time for Gatton panic grass and barley grown as pasture only, crop only or combined (pasture-crop) system (shaded area) when fertilised with 50kg N/ha.

An additional 70kg/ha of urea was top dressed on high nitrogen plots each year.

In 2013, when soil moisture and temperature were favourable for perennial growth, 49% more biomass was produced in summer and 27% more in spring by subtropical grasses in the high nitrogen compared to the low nitrogen plots (Figure 2), however, a significant growth response to nitrogen has not been observed in previous years, thus fertiliser inputs may need to be carefully weighed up based on the presence of a pasture crop and how the season is progressing.

Line chart showing biomass of Gatton panic October 2012-October 2013. Permanent Gatton panic pasture and barley sown into panic at a low nitrogen rate and barley sown into panic at a high nitrogen rate are compared. Y axis:plant biomass kg/ha X axis:date

Figure 2 The response of Gatton panic grass to two rates of nitrogen: low N (50kg N/ha), and high N (80kg N/ha) (see Table 1 for fertiliser type, application time and rates).

Grain yield of barley

The good season (121mm for November 2012 to April 2013 and 310mm for May to October) highlighted a nitrogen deficiency in both the barley crop and perennial grass pasture which is a common issue on high leaching deep sandy soils.

There was a significant yield boost (41%) in response to additional nitrogen (80 v 50 N) for the crop only treatments (that is, no perennial base) (Figure 3).

Barley sown in line with district practice (50kg N/ha; no perennial base) yielded 2.4t/ha.

Using this as a reference (or control) there was a yield penalty (nil to 18%) for crops sown across perennial grass treatments (Figure 3).

Additional nitrogen (extra 30kg N/ha) overcame this penalty.

However, if viewed from the perspective of equivalent nitrogen input the yield penalty was greater (19-26%) for pasture crops fertilised at the higher nitrogen rate (80kg N/ha) relative to the crop only, high nitrogen control (3.5t/ha).

When seeding annual crops into perennial grass pastures, there are logistical advantages to seed between wider rows.

The trial results showed that (a) there was no significant difference in grain yield for barley sown between narrow or wide row (36 vs 72cm) Gatton panic grass plots (Figure 3), and (b) there was little difference in panic biomass production between perennial row spacing treatments (data not shown).

Figure 3 Barley grain yield for crop only and pasture-crop treatments fertilised at two rates of nitrogen (50 and 80kg N/ha) when sown over perennial grasses established on wide or narrow row spacing. Lsd (5%) = 0.53

Conclusion

Results from the northern agricultural region have shown that crops can be sown over subtropical perennial grasses without jeopardising persistence of the perennial base.

However, perennial grasses vary in their tolerance to in-crop herbicides and crop yield is dependent on effective weed control, adequate fertility and moisture, and winter dormancy (or suppression) of the perennial pasture.

Pasture cropping systems can also lift overall biomass production, improve the feed value of stubbles, provide out of season fodder, and reduce the likelihood of wind erosion and groundwater recharge on deep sandy soils.

The application of additional nitrogen can lead to greater biomass in both the annual crop and perennial pasture, however, this is dependent on seasonal conditions and the economics of applying additional nitrogen needs to be considered carefully on low moisture holding, infertile, sandy soils in the northern agricultural region.

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to Chris Vanzetti and the department's research facility for managing the trial.

This research was funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation through the Future Farm Industries Cooperative Research Centre Ltd’s EverCrop project (P2 FP09).

Contact information

Christiaan Valentine
+61 (0)8 9690 2197

Author

Christiaan Valentine